What argument does the Pergamon museum have for stealing our heritage ?

honestly the museum's argument boils down to "we saved it from destruction" which is rich considering how much of the original site is still intact in iraq. the ishtar gate was literally reconstructed from thousands of fragments they shipped out, so their whole narrative is that they're the ones who made it possible to see it whole. but the real insult is that they charge €12 for entry and sell replicas of assyrian artifacts in the gift shop without any revenue sharing. there's actually a small assyrian community in Berlin near Neukölln who've been pushing for restitution talks for years but the museum board keeps saying it's "too complex" to untangle ownership from the ottoman permits

arrow_drop_up 18 arrow_drop_down

chat_bubble Reply ios_share

/

Reply

You're right to be angry about this. The Pergamon's legal defense rests on old Ottoman excavation permits, but the real issue is that those permits were signed by a government that didn't represent Assyrian interests at all. What stings more is that the museum's own research center in Dahlem has a dedicated Assyrian tablet collection they barely display, while the Ishtar Gate gets all the foot traffic and ticket revenue. If you're in Berlin, the Vorderasiatisches Museum does have a small reading room with Assyrian language resources, but that's cold comfort when your heritage is literally a tourist attraction.

arrow_drop_up 10 arrow_drop_down

chat_bubble Reply ios_share

/

Reply

I lived near the museum for years and the whole thing sits uncomfortably with a lot of Berliners too. The actual legal argument they fall back on is the 1899 excavation agreement with the Ottoman Empire, which is basically a colonial-era technicality. If you're ever in Berlin and want to see the Ishtar Gate without giving them money, you can actually view parts of the Processional Way from outside on the street level near the museum's north side, the glazed bricks are visible through the windows.

arrow_drop_up 8 arrow_drop_down

chat_bubble Reply ios_share

/

Reply

Worth noting that Berlin street names have official umlaut and ß rules that trip people up, so a sign showing "Strasse" versus "Straße" is not actually a spelling error, just an older transcription. Same with "ue" versus "ü" (e.g. "Kantstrasse" vs "Kantstraße"), both are considered valid renderings and you'll see the ß version on the blue Schilder and the ss version on older plaques or in databases that predate Unicode. If the difference you're seeing is between those two forms, there's nothing to fix and both are technically correct.

arrow_drop_up 4 arrow_drop_down

chat_bubble Reply ios_share

/

Reply

if the signs u mean are the old enamel ones on the house facades those are often protected as Baudenkmal so nobody's allowed to correct them even if the spelling is outdated. the binding version is whatever is in the Berliner Strassenverzeichnis plus the entry in the Liegenschaftskataster, so if u tell me the street i can point u to the right Bezirksamt Mitte or Charlottenburg-Wilmersdorf page. tbh the merged district thing is real but the facade signs are a separate story, theyre basically museum pieces at this point

arrow_drop_up 3 arrow_drop_down

chat_bubble Reply ios_share

/

Reply

honestly thats super common in Charlottenburg, the district offices were merged from older Bezirke and nobody ever fixed all the Schilder. if its a real street you can check the official strassenverzeichnis on berlin.de, that list is what the Burgeramt actually goes by. which street is it? some of the Kaiserdamm / Kantstrasse signs are notorious for this.

arrow_drop_up 1 arrow_drop_down

chat_bubble Reply ios_share

/

Reply